How should we think about china population
Donald asks…
Can an effeminate US & UK match a masculine China?
Because of their abortion practices, China‘s male population is steadily growing while her female population is steadily decreasing, (in ratio, at least). It is expected, within 20 years, that China‘s male to female ratio will be about 65/35, give or take. As China‘s male ratio increases, experts, logically, expect China‘s militant boldness, confidence, and strength to increase.
Simultaneously, the US and UK are steadily becoming effeminate. Much due to their respective “feminist movements”. Both nations, for the last 4 decades, have attempted to demasculinize men. Attempting to remove the natural aggresion in men. Assuming, this would improve society.
However, without the US and UK noticing, they both may be giving China a greater advantage. China can match both in technology. Yet, soon enough, will crush both in masculine, military power. China would destroy both in close-range combat. By numbers, and strength.
Would an effeminate US and UK be able to overcome a masculine China?
admin answers:
I don’t think “civilizing” men has anything to do with their ability to be aggressive in war. the feminist movement for good or bad, if anything affected perspective more than anything, it did nothing to lower the testosterone levels in men. Alterring ones social interractions does not change their physical strength nor their ability to fight aggressively.
Robert asks…
China or India?
As you all may know, China and India appear to have the greatest potential amongst all the other nations of achieving superpower within the 21st century. Which country would you prefer and why? I would prefer India because it is a democratic nation, it is our important ally in Asia, and it does have a large english-speaking population.
China is not favorable because they are a communist. It is definitely not our ally. Their foreign policies are self-centered and they are not trustworthy.
I’ve asked this question before but I got too many dumb responses like, “China – because India will turn into Iraq,” or “China…Azian pride!” or “India is dangerous. China is safe.” PLEASE DO NOT ANSWER BASED ON PRECONCEIVED NOTIONS.
Use facts! I need intelligent answers.
I am not forcing you to agree with my views.
Just give me an intelligent answer. It seems like the people who answer ‘China‘ are not giving enough information as to why they’re supporting that country.
And just like any other American, I would prefer America myself. But this is only between India and China.
India is a democracy, not just in name.
Indians, just like us Americans, have the right to vote, speak, and do whatever they want.
Good answer, fire fighter.
Fishi, sorry, but your answer was the dumbest ever. You do realize that 40 years from now China is going to have a major recession because right now there population is peaking, they have a skewed population because of 1 child policy, right? Oh, you didn’t know that.
Please, don’t answer if you don’t have intellingent answers.
Also, there isn’t too much different in poverty between India and China.
India’s poverty is available for the whole world to see because they are a democracy. They won’t stop you from seeing their poverty. China‘s, however, is a different story. It’s a communist.
To people who have provided facts, regardless of who they’ve supported, thank you. They were interesting.
admin answers:
We depend on China for a lot of things other than consumer goods.
Richard asks…
Math help appreciated just got home from hospital and missed school teacher refuses to help me catch up PLEASE?
In an attempt to reduce the growth of its population, China instituted a policy limiting a family to one child. Rural Chinese suggested revising the policy to limit families to one son. Assuming the suggested policy is adopted and that any birth is as likely to produce a boy as a girl, explain how to use simulation to answer the following:
a.What would the average family size be?
b.What would be the ratio of newborn boys to newborn girls?
admin answers:
A simulation would model families as follows:
Have each virtual family produce children
which are randomly chosen to be boys or girls,
and stopping when they have a boy.
Then count the total number of boys and girls,
and add to get total number of children.
Count the number of families of each size to get
average size.
So the possible families are:
B
G B
G G B
G G G B
… etc.
Here the results of mine:
502 B
233 GB (that’s almost 3/4 of the families with 1 or 2 children)
152 GGB (now we’re up to 89% of the families)
52 GGGB
36 GGGGB
13 GGGGGB
6 GGGGGGB
2 GGGGGGGB
2 GGGGGGGGB
1 GGGGGGGGGB
1 GGGGGGGGGGB (10 girls in this family!)
Total boys: 1000, girls 987,
and average family size 1.987
There is only a small bias towards boys in this case,
since the larger number of small families balances the
extra girls in the large families.
In practice, probably some families would stop after a certain
number of girls, even without a boy, which would help keep a balance
on the boys/girls ratio.
Other runs gave similar numbers:
1000 boys and 961 girls
1000 and 927
1000 and 1008
(there were always 1000 boys, since I used a sample of 1000 families,
and each gets exactly 1 boy)
Steven asks…
Why is India poorer then China?
they are both smart in businesses, many educated people, one of the worlds leading countries in technology.
China biggest population in the world.
India second biggest population in the world.
share common religions and culture lifestyle.
However, i have visited India as i am indian myself born and bred in the UK. i have not been china. even though they are both really really next to each other that there are a few nepal people living in india and speak indian.
Though i do not know why India is poorer then China as india has one of the biggest slums in the world?
KitCat you dont even know so why you saying that
admin answers:
Sheer determination by the govt and the Chinese people to succeed at no matter what cost. What ever else may be said about the Communist, when they want things done, they get it done!
Unlike India, where I think democracy is actually a hinder in this aspect, where it causes a lot of squabbling and so much discussions and talk, that it’s hard to get things moving in the same directions, let alone a lightening fast speed. Different Indians in different parts of India have their own agendas, no?
Another reason would be the early start, notice China dominates in manufacturing? But it could not have been done without the overseas Chinese and the fact that China had Hong Kong and even to a certain extent, Taiwan (contrary to popular belief, Taiwanese and mainlanders get along fine) who were well-advanced city-states. These outside Chinese people brought connections/technology and know how back to the mainland and helped kick start the whole process.
Well that’s some of the reasons…
Maria asks…
Why do countries like China and India have high populations?
admin answers:
I can’t speak for China but the main reason why India has so many children is due to the people in the lower-class areas seeing children as “economic assets” so to have many means that you will have many children looking after you in old age. As for China, I’m not too sure. I think it goes along the same path of the Farmers viewing their children as “economic assets”, but don’t quote me on that, it’s only an assumption.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
我要评论